Insurance & the Uninsurable: When Climate Risk Redraws the Housing Map

When insurers retreat, the market begins deciding where people can live. Watch the premiums, the non-renewals, the deductibles, and the exclusions — not the pledges.

Mr. Alvarez’s Thoughts | AI Research & Enhancement.

September 2026 | The Displacement Emergency | Pulled from the Climate Tribe Social’s – Insurance & Uninsurable space | Figures Fact Checked Several Times | See December 11th Deadline Notice Below

Most people will never read an IPCC assessment report. Almost every homeowner, though, opens a renewal letter. And in more and more ZIP codes across the country, that letter is where the Climate and Ecological Emergency stops being abstract.

Insurance may be one of the fastest and most consequential climate signals in the economy — not because insurers are morally wiser than governments, but because they are forced to attach a price to loss. Their models translate flood, fire, wind, hail, heat, smoke, rising rebuilding costs, and uncertainty into a bill that households must pay now, not in 2050.

When that bill spikes, when a policy is not renewed, when wind or wildfire coverage is carved out, or when a deductible grows larger than a family’s savings, a community can become functionally uninsurable long before anyone formally declares it unsafe. The houses still stand. The school still opens in September. But the financial conditions required to own, sell, borrow against, repair, or rebuild a home begin to disappear.

That is why this is not only an insurance story. It is a housing story, a mortgage story, a municipal-budget story, an inequality story, and a democracy story. In our Five Emergencies framework it sits squarely inside the Displacement Emergency, because a renewal notice can function as a climate-displacement notice long before a flood, fire, or storm makes the risk impossible to ignore.

What the Numbers Already Say

For years, the link between climate risk and insurance was argued mostly through anecdote. That changed in January 2025, when the U.S. Treasury’s Federal Insurance Office published the first nationwide, ZIP-code-level look at homeowners insurance, built with state regulators and the NAIC from roughly 50 million policies a year written by more than 330 insurers. Its findings for 2018–2022 were blunt:

• Average premiums rose 8.7 percent faster than inflation nationwide.

• Households in the riskiest fifth of ZIP codes paid an average of $2,321 a year — 82 percent more than households in the lowest-risk fifth.

• Non-renewal rates in those high-risk ZIP codes ran about 80 percent higher, and they rose faster, meaning availability was shrinking exactly where risk was growing.

• Average claims in the highest-risk areas were about $24,000, compared with roughly $19,000 in the lowest-risk areas.

The trend did not stop in 2022. Insurify estimates that premiums jumped 12 percent in 2025 and projects another 4 percent in 2026, leaving the typical homeowner paying roughly $900 a year more than in 2021. Some of the steepest increases landed far from any coastline: Minnesota (+34 percent) and Colorado (+33 percent) led 2025, driven by hail, tornadoes, and straight-line winds. Trackers use different methods — LendingTree, for instance, puts the cumulative 2020–2025 increase at 46.8 percent — but every serious data source points in the same direction.

Globally, the Swiss Re Institute counted about $107 billion in insured natural-catastrophe losses in 2025, against roughly $220 billion in total economic losses. The January 2025 Los Angeles fires alone produced about $40 billion in insured losses, a wildfire record, and Swiss Re estimates insured wildfire losses are growing around 12 percent a year. Swiss Re is explicit that 2025’s below-trend total reflected favorable luck, not reduced underlying risk.

Here at home, Climate Central — which took over the billion-dollar disaster database after NOAA stopped maintaining it in 2025 — counted 12 billion-dollar weather and climate disasters in the first half of 2026 alone, bringing the U.S. total since 1980 to 438 events costing more than $3.2 trillion.

At a Glance

Sources for each figure are listed at the end of this post.

“Uninsurable” Is Not One Thing

Uninsurability is rarely a single cliff-edge moment. A place can be uninsurable in practice while a policy is still technically for sale. A household may face:

• Unaffordable coverage: a policy exists, but the premium consumes an unsustainable share of household income.

• Unavailable private coverage: standard insurers decline to write or renew in a ZIP code, county, neighborhood, or hazard zone.

• Inadequate coverage: the policy excludes the peril most likely to strike, carries a massive deductible, or has limits too low to rebuild.

• Conditional coverage: eligibility depends on a new roof, shutters, elevation, brush clearance, or electrical upgrades the owner cannot afford.

• Residual-market dependence: the only option is a FAIR Plan or another insurer of last resort, often at higher cost with narrower protection.

• Unmortgageability: a buyer cannot obtain, keep, or refinance a mortgage because acceptable insurance is unavailable or too costly.

• Self-insurance by necessity: owners — usually those without a mortgage — go without coverage and carry the full risk of catastrophic loss themselves.

Three words should stay separate in every conversation about this crisis: availability, affordability, and adequacy. A policy can be available and still fail every practical test of protection. “Coverage exists” is not the same as “a community remains financially viable.”

How a Premium Becomes a Housing Crisis

The Mortgage Link

For most mortgaged homes, lenders require hazard insurance on the structure. If a borrower cannot maintain acceptable coverage, the lender can buy force-placed (lender-placed) insurance and bill the borrower for it. That coverage is typically expensive, often protects mainly the lender’s interest, and can push an already stretched household toward delinquency or foreclosure.

The chain of pressure looks like this:

1. Climate loss risk rises.

2. Premiums, non-renewals, deductibles, and exclusions follow.

3. Mortgage and refinancing stress builds.

4. The pool of qualified buyers shrinks.

5. Property values and the local tax base weaken.

6. The community loses capacity to invest in adaptation — and risk rises again.

That sequence is not automatic, and it can unfold slowly or unevenly. But its direction worried Jerome Powell enough that, testifying as Federal Reserve Chair in February 2025, he told the Senate Banking Committee that within 10 to 15 years there would be “regions of the country where you can’t get a mortgage.”

Forward-looking models point the same way. First Street’s 2025 national report projected about $1.47 trillion in climate-driven property-value losses by 2055, touching 84 percent of U.S. census tracts, driven by insurance pressure and shifting demand. Treat that as a scenario, not a verdict: the estimate does not account for local adaptation, and so far many Americans are still moving toward higher-risk places. That second fact is its own warning.

The Protection Gap

One of the most important ideas in this whole conversation is the protection gap: the difference between total economic losses from disasters and the share actually covered by insurance. In 2025 roughly half of global natural-catastrophe losses were insured — a record-high share, according to Swiss Re — which still means about half were not.

Every uninsured dollar lands somewhere. It falls on:

• Households and renters.

• Small businesses.

• Local governments and state budgets.

• Federal disaster programs and taxpayers nationwide.

• Charities, congregations, and mutual-aid networks.

A family without adequate insurance does not simply lose a house. It can lose savings, credit, employment stability, school continuity, health, and the ability to remain in its community. A town with widespread uninsured losses faces slow rebuilding, vacant lots, falling assessments, and deepening inequality.

Why Premiums Rise — and Why the Answer Matters

Climate change is central to this story. But readers deserve the whole picture, because the right policy response depends on the cause. Premium increases can reflect:

• More frequent or more severe climate-amplified hazards — including hail and convective storms far inland.

• More homes and more expensive assets built in harm’s way.

• Higher construction, labor, and materials costs, including tariff effects on building materials.

• Higher reinsurance costs — the insurance that insurers buy to protect themselves after catastrophes.

• Claims litigation and fraud in some markets.

• Aging or vulnerable housing stock.

• Catastrophe-model revisions as insurers update their expectations.

• Rate regulation that delays increases, sometimes producing sharp catch-up hikes later.

New York City shows how these drivers mix. Insurance costs for the city’s older rent-stabilized buildings have climbed steeply, with experts pointing to climate exposure and a shrinking pool of carriers willing to write multifamily coverage. At the same time, a 2026 analysis by LegalClaimsAI and the NYU Furman Center — commissioned by a firm that sells captive insurance to landlords, which is worth noting — found legal claims per 100,000 rental units rose nearly 70 percent between 2021 and 2024.

None of this makes climate secondary. It means climate risk interacts with housing policy, land use, construction costs, the legal system, and the financial system — and fixing one without the others will not hold.

A Signal, Not a Verdict

It is tempting to call insurance “the most honest climate signal in the economy.” A more defensible version: it is one of the fastest and most consequential signals, but not a pure or impartial one. Premiums reflect physical risk — and also insurer models, reinsurance prices, construction inflation, regulation, market concentration, and corporate decisions about where to deploy capital.

Models can be wrong, backward-looking, or opaque. Insurers may withdraw broadly rather than distinguish a well-hardened home from an unprotected one. The reverse is also true: underpriced or subsidized insurance can mask risk and encourage continued building in dangerous places. Even good news needs reading carefully. Florida’s Citizens Property Insurance is lowering its average rate about 9 percent in 2026, partly because it moved policyholders back to private carriers — a healthier market, perhaps, but not the same thing as less risk.

The task is not to obey the market blindly. It is to use the signal without allowing it to become a mechanism of unequal abandonment.

Renters Are Not Insulated

The insurance crisis is usually told as a homeowner problem. It is also a renter problem, a housing-supply problem, and a neighborhood-stability problem.

The Climate and Community Institute estimates that more than 18 million occupied rental units — 41 percent of the total — sit in areas with substantial expected climate losses, and that monthly insurance costs for the average multifamily unit rose more than 75 percent between 2019 and 2024, roughly three times faster than overall operating costs.

Here in New York, the NYU Furman Center found that insurance costs for the city’s older, heavily rent-stabilized buildings rose about 150 percent between 2019 and 2025 — faster than any other major operating expense. Over roughly the same years, housing-code violations in those buildings climbed 47 percent. When insurance eats the budget, repairs are often what get cut.

A renter may never see the insurance bill but can still be displaced through:

• Rent increases passed through from a landlord’s rising premiums.

• Deferred maintenance and declining habitability.

• Building sale or abandonment after repeated losses.

• Loss of affordable units after a disaster.

• Evictions or non-renewals during repair, reconstruction, or redevelopment.

• Inability to afford renters insurance, or to replace belongings after an uninsured loss.

• Loss of jobs, services, transit, schools, and community networks when a neighborhood struggles to recover.

Policy can push back. In 2024, New York became the first state to bar property insurers from asking about — or making coverage decisions based on — a building’s affordable-housing status or tenants’ source of income, after Gothamist found that nearly all of the insurance applications it reviewed asked whether owners rented to voucher holders. In 2026 the state added a $5 million pilot to help nonprofit affordable-housing owners join insurance captives, a form of pooled self-insurance. These are exactly the kinds of structural fixes renters rarely hear about.

Wealth Decides Who Stays

The same premium increase means radically different things to different households:

• A wealthier owner can pay more, accept a larger deductible, retrofit the property, or self-insure.

• A lower-income owner may defer maintenance, drop coverage, lose mortgage eligibility, or sell under pressure.

• An investor may buy distressed properties at a discount.

• A renter may simply receive a rent increase — or a moving notice.

Insurance pressure does not fall on a level field; it lands on top of existing gaps in wealth, savings, and political voice. That is why this is not only a risk-pricing question. It is a distributional one: who absorbs risk, who receives public support, who can rebuild, and who is pushed out.

The Public Backstops: Warning Lights, Not Solutions

FAIR Plans

State FAIR Plans exist because private markets do not reliably cover every property. They are essential emergency backstops, and their growth is one of the clearest measures of market stress. Nationwide, FAIR Plans cover nearly 3 million properties with more than $1 trillion in exposure, according to Insurance Information Institute data.

California shows what happens when a backstop becomes a primary market. Its FAIR Plan now serves more than 675,000 customers, and its leadership has acknowledged holding half or more of the market in some parts of the state. After the January 2025 Los Angeles fires drained its reserves, regulators approved a $1 billion assessment on member insurers, up to half of which may be recouped from policyholders statewide through a temporary fee. Starting October 15, 2026, FAIR Plan rates rise an average of 29.1 percent — the largest increase in recent memory — and some high-wildfire-risk households will see their fire premiums double.

Coverage is also thinner. California’s FAIR Plan is essentially fire coverage; households typically need a separate “difference in conditions” policy for liability, water damage, theft, and other perils.

The core point: when private insurers retreat, the risk does not disappear. It moves — to policyholders, to state-backed pools, to every insured household that helps pay assessments, and potentially to the public.

Flood: The Gap Hiding in Plain Sight

Standard homeowners policies generally do not cover flood. A homeowner can be “insured” and still be uninsured for the disaster most likely to hit them. Wind, named-storm, wildfire, sewer-backup, smoke, mold, and earth-movement coverage also vary sharply by policy and location. Never assume a policy protects against your local hazard without reading the declarations page and the exclusions.

The National Flood Insurance Program is the backbone of U.S. residential flood coverage, with about 4.6 million policies and roughly $1.3 trillion in coverage. It is also a case study in how hard catastrophe risk is to price. Even after $16 billion in debt was canceled following the 2017 hurricane season, the program owes the Treasury about $22.5 billion and has paid more than $6 billion in interest since 2005 — money that could have funded claims or mitigation.

Its authority has lived on short-term extensions for years — 35 of them between late 2017 and early 2026 — and it lapsed for 43 days during the late-2025 shutdown. During a lapse, no new or renewal policies can be written, and the National Association of Realtors estimates roughly 1,300 home sales a day can be affected. In early September 2026, Congress passed a continuing resolution extending the NFIP through December 11, 2026. Mark that date.

Mitigation Money on a Court Docket

Public investment in risk reduction is supposed to be the long-term answer to rising premiums. Yet FEMA’s largest competitive pre-disaster mitigation program, Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC), was canceled in April 2025, freezing roughly $3.6 billion in projects. A coalition of states sued; a federal court vacated the cancellation in December 2025 and ordered enforcement in March 2026, and a reissued funding round finally closed in July 2026. Whether communities can reduce risk — and therefore whether they stay insurable — is being decided in courtrooms and budget fights, not only by insurers.

The Data We Almost Lost

Communities cannot manage what they cannot measure. In 2025, NOAA stopped updating its Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters database, a resource insurers, researchers, and local planners had relied on for decades. The nonprofit Climate Central rebuilt it with the same lead scientist and methods. Public, neighborhood-level disaster and insurance data is a resilience tool — and it has proven fragile.

What Works — and Its Limits

Mitigation, at Home and at Neighborhood Scale

Risk reduction can improve safety, reduce losses, and sometimes improve insurance availability or pricing — but only when the work is real, verified, and recognized by insurers. Examples include:

• Wildfire zones: Class A fire-rated roofs, ember-resistant vents, non-combustible siding and decks, and maintained defensible space. California’s FAIR Plan and many private insurers now offer hardening discounts; ask for them in writing.

• Flood zones: elevation, flood vents, drainage improvements, and floodproofing where appropriate.

• Wind and hurricane zones: fortified roofs, shutters, reinforced garage doors, and roof-to-wall connections.

• Everywhere: well-maintained roofs and upgraded electrical systems to reduce avoidable losses.

• Community scale: drainage, cooling, vegetation management, emergency access, resilient power, and building codes matched to local hazards — paired with grants so compliance does not become another affordability burden.

But be honest about the limits. A homeowner cannot retrofit their way out of a failing drainage system, an eroding coastline, a degraded watershed, a weak levee, an overwhelmed fire district, or a warming trajectory that keeps intensifying hazards. Many insurance problems require neighborhood-scale and public-scale solutions.

Parametric Insurance

Parametric insurance pays a preset amount when an agreed trigger is met — rainfall above a threshold, wind speed above a limit, flood depth across a defined area — instead of adjusting each individual loss. That makes payment faster.

New York City has tested the idea. In 2023 the Center for NYC Neighborhoods, working with the Mayor’s Office of Climate & Environmental Justice, the Environmental Defense Fund, and other partners, launched a pilot backed by Swiss Re Corporate Solutions that could release up to $1.1 million after a qualifying flood, with low- and moderate-income households eligible for grants of up to $15,000. The trigger combined satellite radar, the city’s FloodNet street sensors, and other real-time data.

• Benefits: fast cash when families need it most; useful for small businesses, farmers, local governments, and mutual-aid groups; covers immediate liquidity needs that traditional claims cannot meet quickly.

• Limits: the central risk is basis risk — the mismatch between the trigger and your actual loss. The trigger can fire when you lost little, and you can lose everything when it does not fire. Payouts may fall short of rebuilding needs.

Parametric cover is a supplement, not a replacement for comprehensive property insurance.

Community and Cooperative Models

Community-based approaches include mutual aid, community catastrophe funds, resilience districts, pooled-risk programs, cooperatives, captives, public reinsurance, and local mitigation investment tied to affordability protections. New York’s captive pilot for nonprofit housing is one real-world example.

These models can strengthen bargaining power and spread costs. But they cannot sustainably insure repeated catastrophic losses without real risk reduction, outside capital, ongoing public support — or, in the most exposed places, a plan to relocate. Solidarity does not repeal physics.

The Hardest Conversation

Managed retreat must be voluntary, adequately funded, community-led, and protective of renters, Indigenous communities, low-income households, elders, and people with limited mobility. It is neither simple nor inevitable — but we cannot pretend the question away. The worst version of retreat is the one already happening silently: by premium, by non-renewal, and by the slow departure of everyone who can afford to leave.

What You Can Do Now

This section is educational, not legal, insurance, or financial advice. For your specific situation, consult your state insurance department, a licensed professional, or a legal-aid organization.

Homeowners

• Get it in writing. Request the specific reason for any non-renewal, underwriting restriction, or premium increase.

• Ask what would change the answer. Which mitigation steps, inspections, documentation, or repairs would improve eligibility or pricing?

• Compare like for like, not just price. Check dwelling limits, replacement-cost terms, standard and wind or hurricane deductibles, wildfire exclusions, water-backup coverage, ordinance-and-law coverage, and additional living expenses.

• Match coverage to today’s rebuilding costs, not your home’s market value or an outdated estimate.

• Never let coverage lapse while shopping. A gap can make replacement coverage harder and costlier to find.

• Document everything. Photograph and inventory belongings; store policies, receipts, inspections, and mitigation records outside the home and in secure cloud storage.

• Know your appeal rights. Your state insurance department, consumer advocates, and legal-aid groups can explain complaint and appeal processes.

• Be careful with surplus-lines policies. They can be legitimate and necessary, but they generally lack some of the rate oversight and guaranty-fund protections of admitted policies.

• If you are considering going without coverage, count the full cost honestly. Going bare is not saving a premium; it is accepting responsibility for a potentially catastrophic loss.

Renters

• Get renters insurance where it is available and affordable. It typically covers belongings and liability — not the building — and flood usually requires separate coverage.

• Ask your landlord whether the building is insured for local hazards, and what the repair and relocation plan is after a disaster.

• Keep a photo and video inventory with serial numbers, receipts, and copies of essential documents.

• Know your tenant protections on habitability, displacement, rent increases, disaster repairs, and security deposits.

• Organize with your neighbors if insurance costs are cited to justify rent increases without transparency.

Communities

• Track non-renewals, premium increases, exclusions, FAIR Plan enrollment, claim denials, and uninsured losses by neighborhood — not only statewide averages.

• Demand public, geographically detailed reporting from insurers and regulators that reveals disparities while protecting personal privacy.

• Tie public mitigation funding to anti-displacement protections, tenant protections, affordability covenants, and locally accountable planning.

• Resist rebuilding that simply restores pre-disaster vulnerability.

• Make room for the difficult, necessary conversation about voluntary, well-funded, rights-respecting relocation from the highest-risk places.

This is exactly the kind of work we envision for Adaptive Resiliency Centers (ARCs): community-powered hubs where neighbors document losses, compare policies, file appeals, apply for mitigation assistance, and navigate post-disaster aid together — so that no one faces a renewal letter alone.

Post the Number — Safely

(Members Only)

Anecdotes move hearts; patterns move policy. If your premium moved, share the number in a way that builds a usable public record. Helpful details include:

• ZIP code or county — never your street address.

• Owner or renter, and the year of renewal.

• Previous and new annual premium, and the percentage change.

• Any non-renewal, cancellation, or coverage restriction.

• Deductible changes and newly added exclusions or endorsements.

• Your area’s main hazards: flood, wildfire, coastal, wind, or severe storm.

• Whether you were steered to a FAIR Plan, surplus-lines carrier, or other last-resort option.

• Mitigation you completed, and whether it changed eligibility or price.

• Household impact: cut spending, delayed repairs, mortgage hardship, considering a move, or unable to buy, sell, or refinance.

• Your insurer and policy type — only if you are comfortable naming them.

To calculate your increase:

Premium increase (%) = (New premium − Previous premium) ÷ Previous premium × 100

For example, a premium that moves from $2,000 to $2,600 rose 30 percent.

Protect yourself: never post your policy number, full street address, mortgage account details, claim number, personal phone number, or any document containing sensitive personal information.

How to Share Your Number Now

(Members Only)
Since the Insurance & the Uninsurable Space is not open within ClimateTribe.Social yet, send your report by email to contact@climatechangecommunity.com with the subject line Post the Number. Please write in plain text only — no links, no attachments, and no photos or screenshots of policy documents. You can copy and fill in the template below:

ZIP code or county:

Owner or renter:

Renewal year:

Previous annual premium:

New annual premium:

Non-renewal, cancellation, or restriction (details):

Deductible or exclusion changes:

Main local hazards:

Steered to a FAIR Plan or other last-resort option? (yes/no):

Mitigation completed, and whether it changed anything:

Household impact:

What happens to your report: your name and email address are removed before any number appears in public, and results are shared only at the ZIP-code or county level. By sending a report, you agree that it may be shared in that anonymized form. When the Space opens, these early reports will seed its community tracker, so the record begins with your experience instead of starting from zero.

The tracker’s permanent home will be the Insurance & the Uninsurable Space, part of The Displacement Emergency Collection on ClimateTribe.Social, which is scheduled to open to the public on December 21, 2026, and possibly sooner. The goal is not anecdote alone. It is a visible local record of how climate risk is being priced, shifted, and experienced.

Questions for Regulators and Elected Officials

• Which ZIP codes, counties, and communities have seen the largest premium increases and non-renewals?

• How many homes rely on the FAIR Plan or other residual markets, and how fast is that number growing?

• What do those policies exclude, and what additional policies must households buy to be fully protected?

• How exposed is the state’s insurer of last resort to a major catastrophe — and who pays if it runs short?

• Are mitigation discounts transparent, evidence-based, and realistically within reach of low- and moderate-income households?

• Are resilience funds reaching renters, manufactured-home residents, seniors, disabled people, and historically underinvested neighborhoods?

• Do zoning, building codes, and infrastructure decisions reduce future exposure — or keep adding people and assets to the highest-risk areas?

• How will the state protect households from involuntary displacement without subsidizing unsafe development?

• What is the long-term plan for places where risk cannot be reduced to an insurable level?

The Map Is Being Redrawn

Insurance is not a distant financial-sector story. It is a household budget, a mortgage condition, a renter’s next rent increase, a town’s tax base, and a community’s ability to recover after disaster.

When private insurers retreat, the damage does not disappear. It moves — to homeowners with larger deductibles, to renters facing higher rents, to state-backed insurers of last resort, to underfunded public systems, and to taxpayers. The question is not whether someone will carry climate risk. The question is who will carry it, whether they can afford it, and whether they had any democratic say in the decision.

So yes, watch the premiums. But also watch the exclusions, the deductibles, the non-renewals, the force-placement notices, the FAIR Plan enrollments, the uninsured losses, and the neighborhood-by-neighborhood disparities. These are not just insurance data points. They are early warnings about where climate change is turning into financial exclusion.

This is what Adaptive Resiliency asks of us: to turn climate concern into climate competence — to understand the machinery well enough to change it, and to face it together rather than one renewal letter at a time.

Members – If your premium moved, share the number — safely — at contact@climatechangecommunity.com. If you received a non-renewal, tell us what happened. If your community found a fair way to reduce risk without pushing people out, share that too. The map is being redrawn. It should not be redrawn in silence.

A note on process: Artificial intelligence was used in researching, fact-checking, and drafting this post to enhance my creativity and thinking. The perspective, the priorities, and the responsibility for what appears here remain mine.

Compiled & Mr. Alvarez’s Thoughts | AI Enhanced.

Sources

1. U.S. Treasury, Federal Insurance Office — Analyses of U.S. Homeowners Insurance Markets, 2018–2022 (January 2025). https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2791
2. Insurance Business — FIO ZIP-code-level homeowners data (dataset scope). https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/us/news/property/fio-data-reveals-sharp-rise-in-homeowners-premiums-in-climateexposed-zip-codes-539929.aspx
3. Insurance Journal — US Home Insurance Prices Set to Keep Rising With Severe Weather (March 2026). https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2026/03/18/862372.htm
4. Insurify — 2026 home insurance price projections (incl. Florida Citizens rate change). https://insurify.com/homeowners-insurance/report/home-insurance-price-projections/
5. LendingTree — State of Home Insurance: 2026. https://www.lendingtree.com/insurance/state-of-home-insurance/
6. Swiss Re Institute — Global natural catastrophe losses in 2025 (sigma 1/2026). https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/sigma-research/sigma-2026-01-natcat-2025-wildfire-storm-risk/global-natcat-losses-2025.html
7. Insurance Journal — Wildfires, storms, floods account for record 92% of global insured losses (March 2026). https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2026/03/23/863087.htm
8. Climate Central — Mid-2026 Update: U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters. https://www.climatecentral.org/climate-matters/mid-year-billion-dollar-disasters
9. Yahoo Finance — Powell predicts a time when mortgages will be impossible to get in parts of US (February 2025). https://finance.yahoo.com/news/powell-predicts-a-time-when-mortgages-are-impossible-to-get-in-parts-of-us-190820551.html
10. HousingWire — First Street’s “Property Prices in Peril” report (February 2025). https://www.housingwire.com/articles/climate-risk-real-estate-value-declines-first-street/
11. Climate and Community Institute — How the Property Insurance Crisis Impacts Multifamily Rental Housing and Renters (May 2026). https://climateandcommunity.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Insurance-Crisis-in-Multifamily-Housing-Fact-Sheet.pdf
12. Bloomberg Law — Soaring Insurance Costs Hit Owners of NYC Rent-Stabilized Units (November 2025). https://news.bloomberglaw.com/new-york-brief/soaring-insurance-costs-hit-owners-of-nyc-rent-stabilized-units
13. CRE Daily — NYC rent-stabilized buildings: insurance costs and code violations. https://newsletter.credaily.com/p/nyc-rent-stabilized-landlords-squeezed-by-soaring-insurance-costs
14. Insurance Business — NYC rental building claims analysis (2026). https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/us/news/claims/nyc-rental-building-claims-nearly-doubled-since-2021-bronx-hardest-hit-589645.aspx
15. Gothamist — New York bans insurance discrimination against low-income tenants (April 2024). https://api-prod.gothamist.com/news/new-york-bans-insurance-discrimination-against-low-income-tenants
16. NYS Homes and Community Renewal — Risk Reduction and Insurance Affordability pilot (February 2026). https://hcr.ny.gov/node/76401
17. Stateline / News From The States — FAIR Plans nationwide (Insurance Information Institute data). https://www.newsfromthestates.com/node/373933
18. KQED — California FAIR Plan announces 29.1% rate hike (August 2026). https://www.kqed.org/news/12094860/california-fair-plan-announces-29-1-rate-hike-for-homeowners-this-fall
19. Insurance Business — California FAIR Plan market share and coverage debate (2026). https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/us/news/property/california-bill-would-expand-fair-plan-to-full-homeowners-coverage–insurers-push-back-564210.aspx
20. FireRisk.ai — California FAIR Plan 2026 ($1 billion assessment summary). https://firerisk.ai/fire-insurance/california-fair-plan
21. Congressional Research Service — What Happens If the NFIP Lapses? (2026). https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/IN10835.html
22. Congressional Research Service — NFIP Borrowing Authority (March 2026). https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/2026-03-10_IN10784_7300eba688a8827c8abddacb2ee0aa444e876963.html
23. FEMA — NFIP debt and interest expenses. https://www.fema.gov/fr/node/652788
24. Congress.gov — H. Rept. 119-456, NFIP Extension Act of 2026 (2025 lapse dates). https://www.congress.gov/committee-report/119th-congress/house-report/456/1
25. FEMA — Congressional Reauthorization for the NFIP. https://www.fema.gov/flood-insurance/rules-legislation/congressional-reauthorization
26. NAHB — National Flood Insurance Program Extended Through Dec. 11 (September 2026). https://www.nahb.org/blog/2026/09/nfip-extension
27. Congressional Research Service — FEMA’s BRIC: Recent Developments (2026). https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IN12609
28. OpenGrants — Climate Resilience Grants Now Run on a Court Docket (July 2026). https://opengrants.io/climate-resilience-grants-run-on-court-docket/
29. Insurance Journal — New York City Launches Parametric Flood Program (March 2023). https://amp.insurancejournal.com/news/east/2023/03/08/711441.htm
30. Beinsure — NYC parametric flood pilot data sources, including FloodNet (2023). https://beinsure.com/news/swiss-re-iceye-tests-parametric-flood-insurance/